Catholic Advocate Network
The Grassroots Public Policy Initiative of the Catholic Diocese of Sioux Falls

"[W]e are facing an enormous and dramatic clash between good and evil, death and life, the “culture of death” and the “culture of life”. ... [W]e are all involved and we all share in it, with the inescapable responsibility of choosing to be unconditionally pro-life.”   ~ Pope John Paul II Evangelium Vitae 28

 

 

FACT SHEET

SB 182

Prohibit Capital Punishment of Juvenile Offenders

and

SB 207

Repeal the Death Penalty

 

THE CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF SIOUX FALLS SUPPORTS SB 182 AND SB 207

While criminals who threaten the lives and rights of our families, friends, and fellow South Dakotans must be held accountable for their actions, violent responses by the State only beget more violence.  The State must lead by example.  Instead of encouraging the culture of death by killing criminals, we must seek punishments for crimes that respect the dignity of human life while preserving justice.  Nothing a person does can change his or her inherent dignity and worth as a child of God.  And there is nothing the State could do to a person that violates that person’s human dignity more then to take his or her life.

 

GENERAL FACTS ON THE DEATH PENALTY

  • The death penalty is not an effective deterrent.

  • There are strong indications that the death penalty actually increases people’s tolerance of and tendency toward violent behavior.

  • There are four inmates currently sentenced to death in South Dakota: 

Donald Moeller, Lincoln County, for murder;
Charles Rhines, Pennington County, for murder;
Briley Piper, Lawrence County, for murder; and
Elijah Page, Lawrence County, for murder.

  • Thirteen people have been legally executed in South Dakota since 1877.

  • The last execution in South Dakota took place 57 years ago.

CATHOLIC CHURCH TEACHINGS

  • While the Church continues to maintain that state authorities have an obligation to protect society from aggressors, including the use of capital punishment, “if this is the only possible way of effectively defending human lives against the unjust aggressor,” other options (life in prison without parole) and the development and technology of our penal system, make the carrying out of such a punishment "rare if not practically nonexistent." (John Paul II, Evangelium Vitae 56.)

  • This teaching flows from the Church’s consistent ethic of life that all human life, from the unborn, to the disabled, to the elderly, and the prisoner, even the most hardened criminal, demand dignity and respect.

  • Pope John Paul II, the Catechism of the Catholic Church, and the U.S. Catholic Bishops have made it clear that our society has other ways to protect itself from those who commit terrible crimes and ought to forgo the use of the death penalty, especially in the case of juveniles.

QUOTES FROM THE CATECHISM

 

2265 Legitimate defense can be not only a right but a grave duty for one who is responsible for the lives of others. The defense of the common good requires that an unjust aggressor be rendered unable to cause harm. For this reason, those who legitimately hold authority also have the right to use arms to repel aggressors against the civil community entrusted to their responsibility.

 

2266 The efforts of the state to curb the spread of behavior harmful to people's rights and to the basic rules of civil society correspond to the requirement of safeguarding the common good. Legitimate public authority has the right and the duty to inflict punishment proportionate to the gravity of the offense. Punishment has the primary aim of redressing the disorder introduced by the offense. When it is willingly accepted by the guilty party, it assumes the value of expiation. Punishment then, in addition to defending public order and protecting people's safety, has a medicinal purpose: as far as possible, it must contribute to the correction of the guilty party.  (Cf. Lk 23:4-43.)

 

2267 Assuming that the guilty party's identity and responsibility have been fully determined, the traditional teaching of the Church does not exclude recourse to the death penalty, if this is the only possible way of effectively defending human lives against the unjust aggressor.

If, however, non-lethal means are sufficient to defend and protect people's safety from the aggressor, authority will limit itself to such means, as these are more in keeping with the concrete conditions of the common good and more in conformity with the dignity of the human person.

Today, in fact, as a consequence of the possibilities which the state has for effectively preventing crime, by rendering one who has committed an offense incapable of doing harm—without definitively taking away from him the possibility of redeeming himself—the cases in which the execution of the offender is an absolute necessity "are very rare, if not practically non-existent.”  (John Paul II, Evangelium vitae 56.)

 

QUOTE BY POPE JOHN PAUL II

PAPAL MASS, ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI, JANUARY 27, 1999

 

“The new evangelization calls for followers of Christ who are unconditionally pro-life: who will proclaim, celebrate and serve the Gospel of life in every situation. A sign of hope is the increasing recognition that the dignity of human life must never be taken away, even in the case of someone who has done great evil. Modern society has the means of protecting itself, without definitively denying criminals the chance to reform (cf. Evangelium Vitae, 27). I renew the appeal I made most recently at Christmas for a consensus to end the death penalty, which is both cruel and unnecessary.”

 


Home | Action Alerts | South Dakota | National | Contact Public Officials | Handbooks & Advocacy Tips | Political Responsibility
TOP ISSUE:  Death Penalty South Dakota

 

Maintained by Travis and Kelly Benson, Catholic Diocese of Sioux Falls Lobbyists and Co-Directors of the Respect Life Office and Catholic Charities.
 Inquires: 
tbenson@sfcatholic.org or kbenson@sfcatholic.org

 

Web Site Hit Counters

Book Stores